Inference to the Best Explanation and Theoretical Entities
نویسنده
چکیده
Scientific entity realism has been challenged on the grounds that it depends on the controversial principle of inference to the best explanation. I defend the view against this challenge, by showing that the particular inferences needed by the entity realist do not have the objectionable features antirealist's cite in questioning inference to the best explanation. Indeed, these inferences are either ones needed by empiricists in arguing for empirical adequacy, or which are no stronger than the realist needs for justifying his claims about ordinary objects.
منابع مشابه
Mathematical Explanation in Science
Does mathematics ever play an explanatory role in science? If so then this opens the way for scientific realists to argue for the existence of mathematical entities using inference to the best explanation. Elsewhere I have argued, using a case study involving the primenumbered life cycles of periodical cicadas, that there are examples of indispensable mathematical explanations of purely physica...
متن کاملاعتبارسنجی اقتصادی از منظر حقوق عمومی
Government seeks to manage every aspects of society including financial affairs, in order to exercise its sovereignty. This management requires keeping and using financial information of citizens which is used in process of credit scoring. On the other hand, financial information of people is known as a part of their privacy and cannot been breached without legal permission, so that legal princ...
متن کاملA Conceptual Analysis of Epistemological Pre-assumptions of Floridi’s Theory of Information Ethics
Background and Aim: This paper aims at conceptual analysis of epistemological pre-assumptions of the theory of “Information Ethics” to provide better understanding about this macro-ethics theory and offer a critical standpoint about some of its pre-assumptions. Methods: A documentary method and a conceptual analysis were used. This research method and approach is best suited to explore pre-assu...
متن کاملEmpirical Data Sets are Algorithmically Compressible: Reply to McAllister ?
James McAllister’s 2003 article, “Algorithmic randomness in empirical data” claims that empirical data sets are algorithmically random, and hence incompressible. We show that this claim is mistaken. We present theoretical arguments and empirical evidence for compressibility, and discuss the matter in the framework of Minimum Message Length (MML) inference, which shows that the theory which best...
متن کاملPlato Seeking for “One Real Explanation” in Phaedo
What this essay is to discuss is Plato''s theory of explanation in Phaedo. In this dialogue, we observe that Socrates criticizes both the natural scientists’ explanations and Anaxagoras’ theory of Mind since he thinks they could not explain all things, firstly, in a unitary and, secondary, in a real way. Thence, we are to call what Plato is seeking as his ideal explanation in Phaedo “One Real E...
متن کامل